Daniel Dennett

in

When he emerged recently from a close brush with death, Professor Daniel Dennett heard that some of his religious friends had prayed for him. True to form, he quipped that it was awfully nice of them, but did they also slaughter a goat? His claim to fame at the moment is his brilliant polemic “Breaking the Spell”.

He is University Professor and Austin B. Fletcher Professor of Philosophy, and Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Studies at Tufts University. He has received two Guggenheim Fellowships, a Fulbright Fellowship, and a Fellowship at the Center for Advanced Studies in Behavioral Science. He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1987.

Dennett’s dangerous ideas

All this from a philosopher. Richard Dawkins has referred to him as “scientifically savvy”, but this is only the tip of the iceberg of Dennett’s dangerous ideas.

His calm, lucid but passionate adherence to structured reasoning and clear explanations of complex subjects have made him an important contributor to scientific discourse. At Atheist Alliance he was awarded the first “Richard Dawkins Award” for his contributions for the furthering of scientific knowledge to the general public and his powerful charges against pestilential religious thought.

The Notion of belief in belief

When focussing on Dennett’s actual contributions, the space allowed can not do it justice. But one sore point that is Dennettian and, therefore, entirely “dangerous” is his notion of “belief in belief”. Every moderate believer can usually be bound up, gagged and shuffled off into the shadowed land of denial, when we come to grips with this idea.

Christopher Hitchens, another noted atheist, says belief in belief is “the strange idea that, though faith itself may be ludicrous and incoherent, the mere assertion of it may possess some virtues of its own.”

In assessing the evolutionary benefits of religious belief (cui bono? Dennett asks us constantly in “Freedom Evolves” and “Breaking the Spell”), Dennett does not fail to give credence where it is deserved. But this is no adherence to the supernatural. On the contrary: It is completely natural, a completely natural occurrence in the world and thus we have the subtitle for “Breaking the Spell” – “religion as a natural phenomenon.”

He may look like Santa Claus but the gifts he brings are not ones that children would willingly grasp by a fireside. His, as with most atheists, is of the beauty of the world without recourse to superstition.

Leave a Comment

Related Posts

Atheism Good or Bad

As an outspoken Atheist, I find the terrible reputation that Atheism receives to be completely and totally irrational. There are countless arguments against the simple belief that there is no ... Read More

Causes of Atheism

Atheism has been around since theism, and in a sense, much longer before it though it wouldn’t have been referred to as atheism. As long as there have been people ... Read More

Nietzsche God is Dead Reactions

Reactions to Nietzsche’s “God is dead” can be reactions to Nietzsche himself or to the words “God is dead,” or to the words in the context of Nietzsche’s overall thought. ... Read More

Agnosticism is possible

If you are a thinking human being, requiring some sort of evidence before you believe, is there any other choice but agnosticism? Why, you may ask, hoping for that incontrovertible ... Read More