Is Atheism Compatible With Morality?

in

This question’s answer must begin with a categorical study of the two concepts. To briefly examine them for the sake of time, atheism is a belief that denies the existence of God, and thus limits intelligence to mankind exclusively. Morality concerns right and wrong, concepts that are extremely vague. As a matter of fact, the terms right and wrong beg definition, or perhaps it is better to say that they are subject headings in the essay of one’s worldview.

One’s belief system dictates what is right and what is wrong, and thus all worldviews contain morality concepts that are defined by that worldview. It can then be said that atheism and morality are not incompatible, because morality is not inherently incompatible with anything.

But any worldview that makes a statement about God restricts what it can possibly say about morality.

So what must an atheist believe in the realm of ethics and why?

The most important ethical implication of atheism is the lack of objective ethics, that is, ethics that apply to everyone. If there is no God, it follows that the only intelligence in this world is that of humans. Every individual finds themselves cast into this world alone, required to choose responsibly, where the responsibility for choices made, falls on you.

Why Atheism and Morality are Compatible

Nietzsche
Nietzsche

Nietzsche, perhaps the most honest and insightful atheist this world has ever known, stated in the thirteenth section of his work entitled The Anti-Christ that, “Let us not under-estimate this fact: that we ourselves, we free spirits, are already a ‘transvaluation of all values,’ a visualized declaration of war and victory against all the old concepts of ‘true’ and ‘not true.'”

The problem that one runs into in society is that morality is often misused to mean objective morality, and in this sense atheism is not compatible with morality. Atheists cannot criticize another on an ethical decision honestly; they have no foundation for it.

The have been arguments, sometimes moderately convincing, for nature-based ethics; what is destructive to life is bad, what is productive to life is good. This is an interesting observation if the conscious destruction of life seems bad, but there is no philosophical basis for this belief. The question remains, why is the destruction of life bad? Because you feel like it should be? It can be said that morality is compatible with atheism, but objective morality most certainly is not.

Leave a Comment

Related Posts

Religion and Violence

Religion does not lead to violence. It is only certain followers of religious leaders that foment violence. The teachers of every major religion have preached and practiced peace. It is ... Read MoreReligion and Violence
curious atheist

Why are Atheists so Curious about Religion

I consider myself agnostic, with a slight lean towards atheism. I don’t necessarily believe that any gods or spiritual deities exist, but I also don’t outright deny the possibility of ... Read MoreWhy are Atheists so Curious about Religion

Nothing Exists

Would Eric Rudolph make a good neoconservative president? News Analysis: a case can be made to nominate serial bomber Eric Rudolph’s neoconservative president of the United States. “It isn’t just ... Read MoreNothing Exists

Teaching Children about Atheism

If you have an atheistic home, one where both parents are atheists, teaching your children about atheism isn’t too much different than teaching your children about any other ideas or ... Read MoreTeaching Children about Atheism

Agnostic but Hesitant Believer

As a born Christian I have a hard time understanding what my true disposition is of religion. I no longer consider myself Baptist or Catholic, which those are what my ... Read MoreAgnostic but Hesitant Believer